![]() |
wine-pages special in-depth features, seasonal items and the wine essay collection. |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
part II |
Chile 2010 text and photographs ©2007 Tom Cannavan
go to part II Talking to dozens of winemakers on a trip to New Zealand last year, a common topic of discussion was Sauvignon Blanc and what a double-edged sword it has become for the Kiwi industry. Sure, being known as "the place that does brilliant Sauvignon" is a coup that gives a small wine country enormous global visibility, but it is also a potential glass ceiling that could stifle other aspects of the New Zealand industry.
The challenge for ChileThe challenge for Chile is complex: it must consolidate its reputation as provider of large volumes of high quality wines at competitive prices, whilst at
Australia has carved itself a reputation for fine wines over the past decade. It has successfully moved public perception on from the 'jug wine' days of the 1970s and early 80s, whilst managing to maintain huge volumes of sales for its lower-priced wines. But that has come at a price of course, and the industry is still somewhat schizophrenic: Australia enjoys an enviable reputation at both the low- and ultra-premium ends, but some perceive a gap in the middle. That might stop today's consumers of big selling brands from sticking with Australia if they move on to more expensive bottles. Chile must avoid this 'doughnut effect' and create a vertical market that covers all price points. In terms of quality wine, Chile will depend on export for the foreseeable future. Of the 7.89 million hectolitres produced in 2005, 4.21 million was exported. Along with the USA and Brazil, the UK remains the most important market. Domestically, annual per capita consumption is around 16 litres (actually slightly up on mid-90s figures against a pattern of falling global consumption), but the majority of that is very low-priced wine indeed.
One interesting case in point is the modern winery of Via, near Talca. I last visited this winery in 2003, when it was deeply involved in a joint venture to make wines for Michel Laroche. It also had a burgeoning portfolio of clients for whom it made wine on contract, including Tesco own label. With vineyards across Chile's regions, Via's whole philosophy was to be an anonymous, client-led, totally flexible 'wine machine' that would make good wines at the right price for anyone who'd pay the going rate. Returning late in 2006 and it's all change at Via. The Laroche relationship has ended, founder and former supremo Jorge Cordeche has taken a back seat (though still a shareholder) and winemaker Julian Grubb has been replaced by the well-travelled Californian Ed Flaherty (in fact, Flaherty, pictured below, has just moved on again to Viña Tarapacá). Though the Tesco own-label range is still an important backbone for the winery, Flaherty and the new management team have been reengineering and repositioning Via as a quality estate winery, with a number of single vineyard bottlings bearing Flaherty's signature. A programme of grafting and replanting has attempted to play to the strengths of their terroirs.
Mob ruleThere does seem to be a new understanding amongst Chile's producers that they must work together to raise standards and improve the world image of 'brand Chile'.There is no better example of this than a project called Vinos de Chile 2010 centred on the Maule region. Maule is the huge, thumping heart of the Chilean industry, responsible for 50 per cent of all wine production. Maule has historically been Chile's boiler-room, with massive plantings of the lacklustre País grape being used to churn out cheap wines. Though much of the País has now gone, low-end wine for bulk export has remained the region's stock in trade.
What this means in practical terms is a spectrum of projects and initiatives, from funding research into the aromas of the Carménère grape at the University of Talca, to exchange programmes with winemakers from France, South Africa, the USA and elsewhere, to arranging and funding visits to the area by potential overseas investors. On my trip I met a representative of Bordeaux's Bernard Magrez (owner of Pape-Clément amongst many other estates), there on 'pre-investment study', funded by Vinos de Chile 2010. Step up, Carménère
As one of the judges for last year's Concurso Carménère, I tasted my way through 50-odd examples. Criticised for an element of herbaceousness that can verge on the aggressively green, the pyrazine character of some Carménère (ironically also found in New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc where it sits more happily) is being managed by better understanding of the canopy, yields and irrigation, but was still evident in a few wines. At its best it adds an intriguing menthol, herby note; at its worst it is unpleasantly vegetal. But the overall quality of Carménère was very good indeed, perhaps being best of all in the section of Carménère-dominant blends. When blended with other Bordeaux varieties and occasionally Syrah, the slightly one-dimensional tendency of the grape can be smoothed, fattened or spiced into a more harmonious wine, yet still retaining its distinctive Carménère signature. Indeed Chile remains a bastion of single varietal wines, yet the future for the best reds might well be in blends, with Carménère providing a decisive point of difference. Onwards and upwards
And exploring of new regions goes on apace. Where once Casablanca had 'cool climate winemaking' all to itself, vineyards are creeping north and south, but also outward towards the Pacific to the west and Andes to the east in search of not only cool climatic conditions, but new and interesting soils and subsoils. A good example is the recently planted Limarí region, some 500 kilometres north of the previous limit of viticulture. Though creeping closer to the Atacama Desert, its proximity to the ocean cools and extends the growing season. Quality names like Viña Tabali have emerged from Limarí, and stalwarts like Concha y Toro are investing heavily. Towards 2010Vinos de Chile 2010 has few obvious 'achievables': firm targets for plantings, production, exports or sales that can be measured in 2010 as a sign of success or failure. In that way it is unlike, for example, the Australian industry's 'Strategy 2025' that attempts to set out a series of milestone targets. Instead there is a raft of important, but less statistically defined improvement projects under way.And perhaps that is no bad thing. When one considers how some all guns blazing programmes have backfired so spectacularly on the Australian industry with over-production, squeezed margins and an unhealthy wine surplus, then setting softer targets that allow for more organic growth and development makes a lot of sense. go to part II, estate profiles and tasting notes. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||